class Prism::RangeNode

Experimental RBS support (using type sampling data from the type_fusion project).

# sig/prism/node.rbs

class Prism::RangeNode < Prism::Node
  def initialize: (Integer flags, Prism::IntegerNode left, Prism::IntegerNode right, Prism::Location operator_loc, Prism::Location location) -> void
end

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
c if a =~ /left/ … b =~ /right/
^^^^
1..2
Represents the use of the ‘..` or `…` operators.

def self.type

def self.type: () -> Symbol

class, but should be faster in a case statement or an array comparison.
Note that like #type, it will still be slower than using == for a single
splitting on the type of the node without having to do a long === chain.
Similar to #type, this method returns a symbol that you can use for
def self.type
  :range_node
end

def accept(visitor)

def accept: (Visitor visitor) -> void
def accept(visitor)
  visitor.visit_range_node(self)
end

def child_nodes

def child_nodes: () -> Array[nil | Node]
def child_nodes
  [left, right]
end

def comment_targets

def comment_targets: () -> Array[Node | Location]
def comment_targets
  [*left, *right, operator_loc]
end

def compact_child_nodes

def compact_child_nodes: () -> Array[Node]
def compact_child_nodes
  compact = []
  compact << left if left
  compact << right if right
  compact
end

def copy(**params)

def copy: (**params) -> RangeNode
def copy(**params)
  RangeNode.new(
    params.fetch(:flags) { flags },
    params.fetch(:left) { left },
    params.fetch(:right) { right },
    params.fetch(:operator_loc) { operator_loc },
    params.fetch(:location) { location },
  )
end

def deconstruct_keys(keys)

def deconstruct_keys: (Array[Symbol] keys) -> { flags: Integer, left: Node?, right: Node?, operator_loc: Location, location: Location }
def deconstruct_keys(keys)
  { flags: flags, left: left, right: right, operator_loc: operator_loc, location: location }
end

def exclude_end?

def exclude_end?: () -> bool
def exclude_end?
  flags.anybits?(RangeFlags::EXCLUDE_END)
end

def initialize(flags, left, right, operator_loc, location)

Experimental RBS support (using type sampling data from the type_fusion project).

def initialize: (Integer flags, Prism::IntegerNode left, Prism::IntegerNode right, Prism::Location operator_loc, Prism::Location location) -> void

This signature was generated using 1 sample from 1 application.

def initialize: (Integer flags, Node? left, Node? right, Location operator_loc, Location location) -> void
def initialize(flags, left, right, operator_loc, location)
  @newline = false
  @flags = flags
  @left = left
  @right = right
  @operator_loc = operator_loc
  @location = location
end

def inspect(inspector = NodeInspector.new)

def inspect(NodeInspector inspector) -> String
def inspect(inspector = NodeInspector.new)
  inspector << inspector.header(self)
  flags = [("exclude_end" if exclude_end?)].compact
  inspector << "├── flags: #{flags.empty? ? "∅" : flags.join(", ")}\n"
  if (left = self.left).nil?
    inspector << "├── left: ∅\n"
  else
    inspector << "├── left:\n"
    inspector << left.inspect(inspector.child_inspector("│   ")).delete_prefix(inspector.prefix)
  end
  if (right = self.right).nil?
    inspector << "├── right: ∅\n"
  else
    inspector << "├── right:\n"
    inspector << right.inspect(inspector.child_inspector("│   ")).delete_prefix(inspector.prefix)
  end
  inspector << "└── operator_loc: #{inspector.location(operator_loc)}\n"
  inspector.to_str
end

def operator

def operator: () -> String
def operator
  operator_loc.slice
end

def type

def type: () -> Symbol

keys will use a jump table.
you can take advantage of the fact that case statements with all symbol
it uses a single integer comparison, but also because if you're on CRuby
can use for comparison. This is faster than the other approaches because
Instead, you can call #type, which will return to you a symbol that you

method calls, and/or array allocations.
these approaches are relatively slow because of the constant lookups,
case statement and doing `case node; when cls1; when cls2; end`. Both of
calling `[cls1, cls2].include?(node.class)` or putting the node into a
classes to see what kind of behavior to perform. Usually this is done by
Sometimes you want to check an instance of a node against a list of
def type
  :range_node
end